Skip to content

Jackson v. Ohio

Petition for certiorari denied on May 20, 2019

Docket No. Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
18-1241 N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2018

Issue: (1) Whether an interrogation that would violate the Fifth Amendment if conducted by a police officer also violates the Fifth Amendment if conducted by a state-employed Child Protective Services caseworker, when the caseworker is required by law to share information obtained in the interrogation with the police and the prosecutor; and (2) whether an interrogation that would violate the Sixth Amendment if conducted by a police officer also violates the Sixth Amendment if conducted by a state-employed CPS caseworker, when the caseworker is required by law to share information obtained in the interrogation with the police and the prosecutor.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
12/19/2018Application (18A672) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 19, 2019 to March 21, 2019, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
01/02/2019Application (18A672) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until March 21, 2019.
03/21/2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 24, 2019)
04/17/2019Brief of respondent Ohio in opposition filed.
04/26/2019Reply of petitioner Demetrius Jackson filed. (Distributed)
04/30/2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.
05/20/2019Petition DENIED.