Trump v. NAACP
Consolidated with:
Docket No. | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
18-588 | Nov 12, 2019 | Jun 18, 2020 | 5-4 | Roberts | OT 2019 |
Holding: The Department of Homeland Security"s decision to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program was arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act.
Judgment: Affirmed and remanded, 5-4, in an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts on June 18, 2020. Roberts delivered the opinion of the court except as to Part IV. Justices Ginsburg, Breyer and Kagan joined that opinion in full, and Justice Sotomayor joined as to all but Part IV. Justice Sotomayor filed an opinion concurring in part, concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part. Justice Thomas filed an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part, in which Justices Alito and Gorsuch joined. Justices Alito and Kavanaugh filed opinions concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Symposium: DACA dj vu (Nicholas Bronni, June 19, 2020)
- Symposium: SCOTUS 2020 and the DACA decision: just another reason to wish it were still 2019 (Kimberly Hermann, June 19, 2020)
- Symposium: DACA and the need for symmetrical legal principles (Zachary Price, June 19, 2020)
- Symposium: Potential hardships to DREAMers can no longer be ignored (Craig Newby and Jeffrey Conner, June 19, 2020)
- Symposium: The Supreme Court again rejects flawed administrative action targeting Latinos (Nina Perales, June 19, 2020)
- Symposium: As administration weighs next steps, it must consider that millions of American patients rely on DACA health care workers (Heather Alarcon, June 19, 2020)
- Opinion analysis: Court rejects Trump administrations effort to end DACA (Updated) (Amy Howe, June 18, 2020)
- Live blog of opinions (Update: Completed) (Kalvis Golde, June 18, 2020)
- A view from the courtroom: A few more words (Mark Walsh, November 12, 2019)
- Argument analysis: Justices torn, hard to read in challenge to decision to end DACA (UPDATED) (Amy Howe, November 12, 2019)
- Argument preview: Justices to review dispute over termination of DACA (Amy Howe, November 5, 2019)
- Justices add securities-law case to merits docket, extend DACA argument (Amy Howe, November 1, 2019)
- Symposium: The governments dissonant DACA drumbeat (Melissa Crow, September 13, 2019)
- Symposium: DACA is unlawful (Elizabeth Murrill, September 13, 2019)
- Symposium: Dream deferred (Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia, September 12, 2019)
- Symposium: Will the court reach the merits...of DACA? (Chris Hajec, September 12, 2019)
- Symposium: The DACA cases may be the next big test for the Roberts Court (Dayna Zolle and Brianne Gorod, September 11, 2019)
- Symposium: Dont judge a brief by its cover: DACA is a good policy that Congress has not authorized (Josh Blackman and Ilya Shapiro, September 11, 2019)
- Symposium: Justices to review dispute over termination of DACA (Amy Howe, September 10, 2019)
- Overview of the courts criminal docket for OT 19 sizeable and significant (Rory Little, September 9, 2019)
- Symposium: Immigration at the Roberts Court one year after Kennedys retirement (John Malcolm, July 25, 2019)
- Justices will weigh in on DACA termination (Updated) (Amy Howe, June 28, 2019)
- Justices send cake sequel back to state court (Amy Howe, June 17, 2019)
- Relist Watch (John Elwood, June 11, 2019)
- Justices reject governments request to expedite DACA petition (Amy Howe, June 3, 2019)
- Government asks justices to expedite new petition on DACA (Amy Howe, May 29, 2019)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
11/05/2018 | Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due December 5, 2018) |
11/27/2018 | Letter of November 27, 2018 from the Solicitor General with respect to corrected supplemental brief of petitioners filed in case No. 18-587 filed. (11/28/2018) |
11/30/2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 5, 2018 to January 4, 2019, submitted to The Clerk. |
12/03/2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted in part; the time is extended to and including December 17, 2018, for all respondents. |
12/06/2018 | Brief amici curiae of The States of Texas, et al. filed. VIDED. |
12/17/2018 | Brief of respondents Trustees of Princeton University, Microsoft Corporation, Maria De La Cruz Perales Sanchez in opposition filed. |
12/26/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019. |
12/26/2018 | Letter waiving the 14-day waiting period under Rule 15.5 filed. |
01/04/2019 | Reply of petitioners Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
01/14/2019 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/18/2019. |
06/10/2019 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2019. |
06/17/2019 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019. |
06/26/2019 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/27/2019. |
06/28/2019 | Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment GRANTED. The petition for a writ of certiorari in No. 18-587 and the petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment in No. 18-589 are granted. The cases are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. VIDED. |
07/01/2019 | Because the Court has consolidated these cases for briefing and oral argument, future filings and activity in the cases will now be reflected on the docket of No. 18-587. Subsequent filings in these cases must therefore be submitted through the electronic filing system in No. 18-587. Each document submitted in connection with one or more of these cases must include on its cover the case number and caption for each case in which the filing is intended to be submitted. Where a filing is submitted in fewer than all of the cases, the docket entry will reflect the case number(s) in which the fling is submitted; a document filed in all of the consolidated cases will be noted as "VIDED." |
07/08/2019 | SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, November 12, 2019. VIDED |
09/03/2019 | CIRCULATED |
09/16/2019 | Record requested from the U.S.C.A. District of Columbia Circuit. |
09/20/2019 | Record received from the U.S.C.A. District of Columbia Circuit, is electronic |
11/12/2019 | Argued. For petitioners: Noel J. Francisco, Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For private respondents: Theodore B. Olson, Washington, D. C. For state respondents: Michael J. Mongan, Solicitor General, San Francisco, Cal. VIDED. |
06/18/2020 | Adjudged to be AFFIRMED and REMANDED (No. 18-587 Vacated in Part, Reversed in Part, and Remanded, and No. 18-589 February 13, 2018 order Vacated, November 9, 2017 order Affirmed in Part, March 29, 2018 order Reversed in Part, and case Remanded). Roberts, C. J., delivered the <a href = 'https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-587_5ifl.pdf'>opinion</a> of the Court, except as to Part IV. Ginsburg, Breyer, and Kagan, JJ., joined that opinion in full, and Sotomayor, J., joined as to all but Part IV. Sotomayor, J., filed an opinion concurring in part, concurring in the judgment in part, and dissenting in part. Thomas, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part, in which Alito and Gorsuch, JJ., joined. Alito, J., and Kavanaugh, J., filed opinions concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part. VIDED. |
07/20/2020 | JUDGMENT ISSUED. |