Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda
Consolidated with:
- Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia
- R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Docket No. | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
17-1623 | Oct 8, 2019 | Jun 15, 2020 | 6-3 | Gorsuch | OT 2019 |
Holding: An employer who fires an individual merely for being gay or transgender violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Judgment: Affirmed, 6-3, in an opinion by Justice Gorsuch on June 15, 2020. Justice Alito filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Thomas joined. Justice Kavanaugh filed a dissenting opinion.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Symposium: LGBT rights and religious freedomfinding a better way (Alexander Dushku and R. Shawn Gunnarson, June 17, 2020)
- Symposium: The triumph of textualism: Only the written word is the law (Jonathan Skrmetti, June 16, 2020)
- Symposium: The simplistic logic of Justice Neil Gorsuchs account of sex discrimination (Ryan Anderson, June 16, 2020)
- Symposium: The moral arc bends toward justice: Toward an intersectional legal analysis of LGBTQ rights (Nicole Berner and Monica Jin Joo Wilk, June 16, 2020)
- Symposium: Progressive textualism and LGBTQ rights (Katie Eyer, June 16, 2020)
- Symposium: The strength of the written word fulfills Title VIIs promise (Sarah Rice, June 15, 2020)
- Opinion analysis: Federal employment discrimination law protects gay and transgender employees (Updated) (Amy Howe, June 15, 2020)
- Live blog of orders and opinions (Update: Completed) (Kalvis Golde, June 15, 2020)
- 2020 Supreme Court Preview presented by Casetext (part one) (SCOTUStalk, January 29, 2020)
- Are we all textualists now?: Amy Howe and Kevin Russell discuss oral arguments in LGBT employment discrimination cases (SCOTUStalk, October 17, 2019)
- Argument analysis: Justices divided on federal protections for LGBT employees (UPDATED) (Amy Howe, October 8, 2019)
- A "view" from the courtroom: Pop culture and protocol (Mark Walsh, October 8, 2019)
- Argument preview: Justices to consider federal employment protection for LGBT employees (Amy Howe, October 1, 2019)
- Symposium:A trio of cases, a lot at stake (Loren AliKhan, September 9, 2019)
- Symposium: Title VII did not and does not extend to sexual orientation or gender identity in 1964 or today (Richard A. Epstein, September 6, 2019)
- Symposium: Lets talk about sex: why Title VII must cover sexual orientation and gender identity (Vanita Gupta and Sharon McGowan, September 5, 2019)
- Symposium: How the Title VII trilogy may test the court (Andrée Blumstein, September 5, 2019)
- Symposium: Textualism's moment of truth (William Eskridge, September 4, 2019)
- Symposium: Hiding elephants in mouseholes: The original meaning of discrimination on the basis of sex (Stephanie Taub and Michael Berry, September 4, 2019)
- Symposium: Justices to consider federal employment protection for LGBT employees (Amy Howe, September 3, 2019)
- Because of sex: Tom Goldstein and Kevin Russell join Amy Howe to discuss new cases involving whether federal employment discrimination laws protect LGBT employees (SCOTUStalk, May 6, 2019)
- Court to take up LGBT rights in the workplace (Updated) (Amy Howe, April 22, 2019)
- Petitions of the day (Aurora Barnes, June 15, 2018)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
05/29/2018 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 2, 2018) |
06/19/2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 2, 2018 to August 16, 2018, submitted to The Clerk. |
06/21/2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 16, 2018. |
07/02/2018 | Brief amici curiae of Public Advocate of the United States, et al. filed. |
08/16/2018 | Brief of respondents Melissa Zarda, et al. in opposition filed. |
09/04/2018 | Reply of petitioners Altitude Express, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed) |
09/05/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018. |
09/11/2018 | Rescheduled. |
11/07/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018. |
11/26/2018 | Rescheduled. |
12/03/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/7/2018. |
12/03/2018 | Rescheduled. |
12/20/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019. |
01/07/2019 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019. |
01/14/2019 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/18/2019. |
02/04/2019 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019. |
02/19/2019 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019. |
02/25/2019 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2019. |
03/11/2019 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019. |
03/18/2019 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019. |
03/25/2019 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/29/2019. |
04/08/2019 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019. |
04/15/2019 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/18/2019. |
04/22/2019 | Petition GRANTED. The petition for writ of certiorari in No. 17-1618 is granted. The cases are consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. VIDED. |
04/23/2019 | Because the Court has consolidated these cases for briefing and oral argument, future filings and activity in the cases will now be reflected on the docket of No. 17-1618. Subsequent filings in these cases must therefore be submitted through the electronic filing system in No. 17-1618. Each document submitted in connection with one or more of these cases must include on its cover the case number and caption for each case in which the filing is intended to be submitted. Where a filing is submitted in fewer than all of the cases, the docket entry will reflect the case number(s) in which the fling is submitted; a document filed in all of the consolidated cases will be noted as “VIDED.” |
05/13/2019 | Petitioner in No. 17-1618, respondents in No. 17-1623, and respondent Aimee Stephens in No. 18-107 shall file their briefs on the merits, pursuant to Rule 33.1(g)(v), on or before Wednesday, June 26, 2019. Respondent in No. 17-1618, petitioners in No. 17-1623, and petitioner and respondent EEOC in No. 18-107 shall file their briefs on the merits, pursuant to Rule 33.1(g)(vi), on or before Friday, August 16, 2019. Reply briefs, if any, pursuant to Rule 33.1(g)(vii), shall be filed on or before Monday, September 16, 2019. Amicus curiae briefs shall be filed pursuant to Rule 37.3. VIDED. |
07/01/2019 | SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, October 8, 2019. VIDED |
08/01/2019 | CIRCULATED |
08/16/2019 | Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 2nd Circuit. |
08/20/2019 | Record received from the U.S.C.A. 2nd Circuit is electronic. |
10/08/2019 | Argued. For petitioner in 17-1618 and respondents in 17-1623: Pamela S. Karlan, Stanford, Cal. For respondent in 17-1618 and petitioners in 17-1623: Jeffrey M. Harris, Arlington, Va.; and Noel J. Francisco, Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) VIDED. |
06/15/2020 | Adjudged to be AFFIRMED (Reversed and remanded in No. 17-1618). Gorsuch, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Alito, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Thomas, J., joined. Kavanaugh, J., filed a dissenting opinion. (Opinion also for No. 18-107). VIDED. |
07/17/2020 | JUDGMENT ISSUED. |
07/31/2020 | AMENDED JUDGMENT ISSUED. |
08/06/2020 | SECOND AMENDED JUDGMENT ISSUED. |