Skip to content

Jenkins v. Hutton

Docket No. Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
16-1116 Not Argued Jun 19, 2017 n/a Per Curiam OT 2016

Holding: On the facts of this case, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit was wrong to hold that it could review Percy Hutton's claim -- that the trial court violated his due process rights during the penalty phase of his trial -- under the miscarriage-of-justice exception to procedural default.

Judgment: Reversed and remanded in a per curiam opinion on June 19, 2017.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
03/10/2017Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 17, 2017)
03/10/2017Appendix of Charlotte Jenkins, Warden filed.
04/05/2017Order extending time to file response to petition to and including May 1, 2017.
05/01/2017Brief of respondent Percy Hutton in opposition filed.
05/01/2017Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Percy Hutton.
05/15/2017Reply of petitioner Charlotte Jenkins, Warden filed. (Distributed)
05/16/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 1, 2017.
06/05/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 8, 2017.
06/12/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 15, 2017.
06/19/2017Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
06/19/2017Petition GRANTED. Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Opinion per curiam. (Detached Opinion)
07/14/2017Petition for Rehearing filed.
08/03/2017DISTRIBUTED.
08/25/2017Rehearing DENIED.
08/25/2017JUDGMENT ISSUED.