Skip to content

Carpenter v. United States

Docket No. Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
16-402 Nov 29, 2017 Jun 22, 2018 5-4 Roberts OT 2017

Holding: The government"s acquisition of Timothy Carpenter"s cell-site records from his wireless carriers was a Fourth Amendment search; the government did not obtain a warrant supported by probable cause before acquiring those records.

Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 5-4, in an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts on June 22, 2018. Justice Kennedy filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Thomas and Alito joined. Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion. Justice Alito filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Thomas joined. Justice Gorsuch filed a dissenting opinion.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
09/26/2016Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 28, 2016)
10/21/2016Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 28, 2016.
10/28/2016Brief amici curiae of Electronic Frontier Foundation, et al. filed.
10/28/2016Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed.
11/21/2016Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including December 28, 2016.
12/15/2016Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including January 27, 2016.
01/27/2017Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
02/10/2017Reply of petitioner Timothy Ivory Carpenter filed.
02/15/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 3, 2017.
02/23/2017Rescheduled.
03/22/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 13, 2017.
04/17/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 21, 2017.
04/24/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 28, 2017.
05/08/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 11, 2017.
05/15/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 18, 2017.
05/22/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 25, 2017.
05/30/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 1, 2017.
06/05/2017Petition GRANTED.
06/22/2017The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 7, 2017.
06/22/2017The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including September 25, 2017.
07/11/2017Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs in support of either party or neither party received from counsel for the petitioner.
07/12/2017Motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis filed by petitioner Timothy I. Carpenter.
07/12/2017Motion to appoint counsel filed by petitioner Timothy I. Carpenter.
07/26/2017Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs in support of either or neither party received from counsel for the respondent.
08/02/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/25/2017.
08/07/2017Joint appendix filed.
08/07/2017Brief of petitioner Timothy I. Carpenter filed.
08/11/2017Brief amici curiae of Data & Society Research Institute and Fifteen scholars of Technology and Society filed.
08/11/2017Brief amici curiae of Competitive Enterprise Institute, et al. filed.
08/14/2017Brief amici curiae of Technology Companies in support of neither party filed.
08/14/2017Brief amicus curiae of Center for Democracy and Technology filed.
08/14/2017Brief amici curiae of Electronic Privacy Information Center, et al. filed.
08/14/2017Brief amicus curiae of The Rutherford Institute filed.
08/14/2017Brief amici curiae of The Center for Competitive Politics, et al. filed.
08/14/2017Brief amici curiae of Empirical Fourth Amendment Scholars filed.
08/14/2017Brief amici curiae of Scholars of the History and Original Meaning of the Fourth Amendment filed.
08/14/2017Brief amici curiae of The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, et al. filed.
08/14/2017Brief amicus curiae of Restore the Fourth, Inc. filed.
08/14/2017Brief amici curiae of Institute for Justice, et al. filed.
08/14/2017Brief amici curiae of Electronic Frontier Foundation, et al. filed.
08/14/2017Brief amici curiae of Scholars of Criminal Procedure and Privacy filed.
08/14/2017Brief amici curiae of United States Justice Foundation, et al. filed.
08/14/2017Brief amici curiae of Technology Experts filed.
09/25/2017Brief of respondent United States filed.
09/29/2017Brief amicus curiae of Michael Varco filed.
10/02/2017Motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis granted by the Court
10/02/2017Motion to appoint counsel filed by petitioner GRANTED and Harold Gurewitz, Esquire, of Detroit, Michigan, is appointed to serve as counsel for the petitioner in this case.
10/02/2017Brief amici curiae of Alabama, et al. filed.
10/02/2017Brief amicus curiae of Professor Orin S. Kerr filed.
10/02/2017Brief amicus curiae of National District Attorneys Association filed.
10/06/2017SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday, November 29, 2017
10/12/2017CIRCULATED
10/18/2017Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit.
10/23/2017Record received from the U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit is electronic.
10/24/2017Reply of petitioner Timothy I. Carpenter filed. (Distributed)
11/29/2017Argued. For petitioner: Nathan F. Wessler, New York, N. Y. For respondent: Michael R. Dreeben, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.
06/22/2018Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Roberts, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Kennedy, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Thomas and Alito, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion. Alito, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Thomas, J., joined. Gorsuch, J., filed a dissenting opinion.
07/24/2018JUDGMENT ISSUED.