Skip to content

Stryker Corp. v. Zimmer Inc.

Consolidated with:

Docket No. Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
14-1520 Feb 23, 2016 Jun 13, 2016 8-0 Roberts OT 2015

Holding: Section 284 of the Patent Act provides that, in a case of infringement, courts "may increase the damages up to three times the amount found or assessed." Under the Federal Circuit's two-part Seagate test, damages may be increased under Section 284 only if the patent owner can show, by clear and convincing evidence, both that "the infringer acted despite an objectively high likelihood that its actions constituted infringement of a valid patent" and that the risk of infringement "was either known or so obvious that it should have been known to the accused infringer." The Seagate test is "unduly rigid" and not consistent with the text of Section 284.

Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 8-0, in an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts on June 13, 2016. Justice Breyer filed a concurring opinion, in which Justices Kennedy and Alito joined.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
06/22/2015Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 24, 2015)
07/24/2015Brief of respondents Zimmer, Inc., and Zimmer Surgical, Inc. in opposition filed.
07/24/2015Brief amici curiae of Independent Inventor Groups filed. (Distributed)
07/24/2015Brief amicus curiae of Nokia Technologies OY, and Nokia USA Inc. filed.
08/06/2015Reply of petitioners Stryker Corporation, et al. filed.
08/12/2015DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 28, 2015.
10/05/2015DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 9, 2015.
10/13/2015DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 16, 2015.
10/19/2015Petition GRANTED. The petition for a writ of certiorari in No. 14-1513 is granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition. The cases are consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.
11/11/2015Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners.
11/19/2015The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' briefs on the merits is extended to and including December 9, 2015. VIDED
11/19/2015The time to file respondents' briefs on the merits is extended to and including January 13, 2016. VIDED
12/09/2015Brief of petitioners Stryker Corporation, et al. filed.
12/09/2015Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.)
12/09/2015Supplemental appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.)
12/14/2015Brief amici curiae of Mentor Graphics Corp., et al. in support of neither party filed. VIDED.
12/15/2015Brief amici curiae of Public Knowledge, The Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Engine Advocacy in support of neither party filed. VIDED.
12/16/2015Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed. VIDED.
12/16/2015Brief amici curiae of Small Inventors filed. VIDED.
12/16/2015Brief amicus curiae of Intellectual Property Professors in support of neither party filed. VIDED.
12/16/2015Brief amici curiae of Nokia Technologies Oy and Nokia USA Inc. filed. VIDED.
12/16/2015Brief amicus curiae of Licensing Executives Society (U.S.A. and Canada), Inc. in support of neither party filed. VIDED.
12/16/2015Brief amicus curiae of Innovention Toys, LLC filed. VIDED.
12/16/2015Brief amicus curiae of Intellectual Property Owners Association in support of neither party filed. VIDED.
12/16/2015Brief amicus curiae of Askeladden LLC in support of neither party filed. VIDED.
12/16/2015Brief amicus curiae of American Intellectual Property Law Association in support of neither party filed. VIDED.
12/16/2015Brief amicus curiae of Ericsson Inc. in support of neither party filed. VIDED.
12/16/2015Brief amicus curiae of Professor Mossoff in support of neither party filed. VIDED.
12/23/2015SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, February 23, 2016
01/04/2016Record requested from U.S.C.A. Federal Circuit.
01/12/2016Record received from U.S.C.A. Federal Circuit is electronic and located on PACER with the exception of Joint Appendix Vols. 1-3.
01/13/2016Brief of respondents Zimmer, Inc. and Zimmer Surgical, Inc. filed.
01/15/2016CIRCULATED.
01/19/2016Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed. VIDED.
01/20/2016Joint motion for divided argument filed by respondents. VIDED.
01/20/2016Brief amicus curiae of BSA I The Software Alliance filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
01/20/2016Brief amici curiae of Intel Corp., et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
01/20/2016Brief amicus curiae of Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
01/20/2016Brief amicus curiae of Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
01/20/2016Brief amici curiae of Dell, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
01/20/2016Brief amici curiae of Certain Members of Congress filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
01/20/2016Brief amicus curiae of EMC Corporation filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
01/20/2016Brief amici curiae of Google Inc., et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
01/20/2016Brief amici curiae of Internet Companies filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
01/25/2016Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED. VIDED
01/25/2016Joint motion for divided argument filed by respondents DENIED. VIDED
02/12/2016Reply of petitioners Stryker Corporation, et al. filed. (Distributed)
02/23/2016Argued. For petitioners: Jeffrey B. Wall, Washington, D. C.; and Roman Martinez, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondents: Carter G. Phillips, Washington, D. C. VIDED
02/23/2016Letter dated February 18, 2016, amending the Corporate Disclosure Statement, received from counsel for respondent Zimmer, Inc. on February 23,2016. (Distributed)
06/13/2016Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Roberts, C. J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Breyer, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Kennedy and Alito, JJ., joined.
07/15/2016JUDGMENT ISSUED
07/25/2016AMENDED JUDGMENT ISSUED