Skip to content

Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc.

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
13-317 5th Cir. Mar 5, 2014 Jun 23, 2014 9-0 Roberts OT 2013

Holding: Investors can recover damages in a private securities fraud action only if they prove that they relied on the defendant's misrepresentation in deciding to buy or sell a company's stock. In Basic Inc. v. Levinson, the Supreme Court held that investors could satisfy this reliance requirement by invoking a presumption that the price of stock traded in an efficient market reflects all public, material information-including material misstatements. Halliburton has failed to provide the "special justification" necessary to overrule that presumption. However, even if plaintiffs do not need to directly prove that the misrepresentation affected the stock price to invoke the Basic presumption, defendants can defeat the presumption at the class certification stage through evidence that the misrepresentation did not in fact affect the stock price.

Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts on June 23, 2014.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
09/09/2013Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 11, 2013)
10/11/2013Brief of respondent Erica P. John Fund, Inc., fka Archdiocese of Milwaukee Supporting Fund, Inc. in opposition filed.
10/11/2013Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed.
10/11/2013Brief amici curiae of Former SEC Commissioners and Officials, and Law Professors filed.
10/11/2013Brief amicus curiae of DRI - The Voice of the Defense Bar filed.
10/29/2013Reply of petitioners Halliburton Co., et al. filed.
10/30/2013DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 15, 2013.
11/15/2013Petition GRANTED.
11/25/2013SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday, March 5, 2014
12/19/2013Record received from U.S.C.A. 5th Circuit. This record is electronic.
12/23/2013The time to file the joint appendix is extended to and including January 13, 2014.
12/30/2013Brief of petitioners Halliburton Co., et al. filed.
12/30/2013Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, In support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondent.
12/31/2013Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, In support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners.
01/06/2014Brief amici curiae of Former Members of Congress, et al., in support of neither party filed.
01/06/2014Brief amicus curiae of Vivendi, S.A. filed.
01/06/2014Brief amicus curiae of Amgen Inc. filed.
01/06/2014Brief of Washington Legal Foundation filed.
01/06/2014Brief amici curiae of Law Professors filed.
01/06/2014Brief amicus curiae of Committee on Capital Markets Regulation filed.
01/06/2014Brief amicus curiae of Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association filed.
01/06/2014Brief amicus curiae of American Institute of Certified Public Accountants filed.
01/06/2014Brief amici curiae of Former SEC Commissioners and Officials, and Law Professors filed.
01/06/2014Brief amicus curiae of DRI - The Voice of the Defense Bar filed.
01/06/2014Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed.
01/13/2014Joint appendix filed. (2 Volumes) (Statement of costs filed)
01/13/2014Supplemental Joint Appendix filed.
01/17/2014CIRCULATED
01/27/2014Record received from U.S.D.C. Northern District of Texas (1 Box).
01/29/2014Brief of respondent Erica P. John Fund, Inc., fka Archdiocese of Milwaukee Supporting Fund, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
02/04/2014Brief amici curiae of Council of Institutional Investors, et al. filed. (Distributed).
02/05/2014Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed. (Distributed)
02/05/2014Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.
02/05/2014Brief amici curiae of Legal Scholars filed. (Distributed)
02/05/2014Brief amici curiae of Former SEC Chairmen William H. Donaldson and Arthur Levitt, Jr. filed. (Distributed)
02/05/2014Brief amici curiae of Securities Law Scholars filed. (Distributed)
02/05/2014Brief amici curiae of Testifying Economists filed. (Distributed)
02/05/2014Brief amici curiae of Civil Procedure Scholars filed. (Distributed)
02/05/2014Brief amici curiae of AARP, et al. filed. (Distributed)
02/05/2014Brief amici curiae of Current and Former Members of Congress and Staff filed. (Distributed)
02/05/2014Brief amici curiae of Financial Economists filed. (Distributed)
02/05/2014Brief amici curiae of Institutional Investors filed. (Distributed)
02/05/2014Brief amici curiae of States of Oregon, et al. filed. (Distributed)
02/21/2014Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.
02/21/2014Reply of petitioners Halliburton Co., et al. filed. (Distributed)
03/05/2014Argued. For petitioners: Aaron M. Streett, Houston, Tex. For respondent: David Boies, Armonk, N. Y.; and Malcolm L. Stewart, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)
06/23/2014Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Roberts, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Ginsburg, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Breyer and Sotomayor, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which Scalia and Alito, JJ., joined.
07/25/2014JUDGMENT ISSUED.

Issue: (1) Whether this Court should overrule or substantially modify the holding of”Basic Inc. v. Levinson, to the extent that it recognizes a presumption of classwide reliance derived from the fraud-on-the-market theory; and (2) whether, in a case where the plaintiff invokes the presumption of reliance to seek class certification, the defendant may rebut the presumption and prevent class certification by introducing evidence that the alleged misrepresentations did not distort the market price of its stock.