Skip to content

Dixon v. University of Toledo

Petition for certiorari denied on October 7, 2013

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
12-1402 6th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2013

Issue: (1) Whether the policymaker exception analysis from Elrod v. Burns and Branti v. Finkel should apply to employee speech cases that do not involve political patronage; and (2) whether a presumption in favor of protecting the free speech interests of a government employee should apply in a case not involving political patronage and where the employee is speaking as a private citizen on a matter of public concern and the speech does not directly criticize her employer or any identified policy of her employer.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
05/28/2013Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 1, 2013)
06/04/2013Order extending time to file response to petition to and including August 15, 2013.
06/19/2013Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.
06/19/2013Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents.
06/27/2013Brief amici curiae of Alliance Defending Freedom, and Pacific Justice Institute filed.
08/02/2013Brief of respondents University of Toledo, et al. in opposition filed.
08/20/2013Reply of petitioner Crystal Dixon filed.
08/21/2013DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 30, 2013.
10/07/2013Petition DENIED.