Skip to content

Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
12-751 6th Cir. Apr 2, 2014 Jun 25, 2014 9-0 Breyer OT 2013

Holding: When a decision by a fiduciary of an "employee stock ownership plan" (ESOP) to buy or hold the employer"s stock is challenged in court, the fiduciary is not entitled to a "presumption of prudence." Instead, ESOP fiduciaries are subject to the same duty of prudence that applies to Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) fiduciaries in general, except that they need not diversify the fund's assets.

Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Breyer on June 25, 2014.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
12/14/2012Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 22, 2013)
01/15/2013Order extending time to file response to petition to and including February 22, 2013.
01/22/2013Brief amicus curiae of Keycorp filed.
01/28/2013Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party received from counsel for the petitioners.
02/22/2013Brief of respondents John Dudenhoeffer, et al. in opposition filed.
03/05/2013Reply of petitioners Fifth Third Bancorp, et al. filed.
03/06/2013DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 22, 2013.
03/25/2013The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
11/12/2013Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
11/25/2013Supplemental response filed by petitioners Fifth Third Bancorp, et al.
11/26/2013DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 13, 2013.
11/26/2013Supplemental brief of respondents John Dudenhoeffer, et al. filed. (Distributed)
12/13/2013Petition GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.
01/08/2014SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday, April 2, 2014
01/14/2014Record received from U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit. The record is electronic.
01/27/2014Joint appendix filed (3 volumes). (Statement of costs filed)
01/27/2014Brief of petitioners Fifth Third Bancorp, et al. filed.
01/28/2014Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners.
01/30/2014Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents.
02/03/2014CIRCULATED.
02/03/2014Brief amicus curiae of KeyCorp filed. (Distributed)
02/03/2014Brief amicus curiae of Delta Air Lines, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
02/03/2014Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed. (Distributed)
02/03/2014Brief amicus curiae of Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association filed. (Distributed)
02/03/2014Brief amicus curiae of ESOP Association filed. (Distributed)
02/26/2014Brief of respondents John Dudenhoeffer, et al. filed. (Distributed)
02/26/2014Letter proposing a lodging of material published in Tax Notes, March 2014, received from counsel for respondents. filed. (Distributed)
02/28/2014Proposal of counsel for respondents to lodge copies of an unpublished article cited to in their brief on the merits.
03/04/2014Brief amicus curiae of AARP filed. (Distributed)
03/05/2014Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. (Distributed)
03/05/2014Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.
03/05/2014Brief amicus curiae of American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations filed. (Distributed)
03/05/2014Brief amici curiae of Law Professors filed. (Distributed)
03/21/2014Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.
03/24/2014Reply of petitioners Fifth Third Bancorp, et al. filed. (Distributed)
04/02/2014Argued. For petitioners: Robert A. Long, Jr., Washington, D. C. For respondents: Ronald Mann, New York, N. Y.; and Edwin S. Kneedler, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)
06/25/2014Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Breyer, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
07/28/2014JUDGMENT ISSUED.

Issue: Whether the Sixth Circuit erred by holding that respondents were not required to plausibly allege in their complaint that the fiduciaries of an employee stock ownership plan abused their discretion by remaining invested in employer stock, in order to overcome the presumption that their decision to invest in employer stock was reasonable, as required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. “” 1101 et seq. (“ERISA”), and every other circuit to address the issue.