Madison County v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York
Petition dismissed under Rule 46 on March 26, 2014
Issue: Whether the 300,000-acre ancient Oneida reservation in New York still exists, neither disestablished nor diminished, despite (1) the federal government"s actions taken in furtherance of disestablishment (including, but not limited to, the 1838 Treaty of Buffalo Creek); (2) this Court"s holding in City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York that the Oneida Indian Nation of New York cannot exercise sovereignty over lands it purchases in the ancient reservation area; and (3) this Court"s finding in that case that land in the ancient reservation area has not been treated as an Indian reservation by the federal, state or local governments for nearly two centuries.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Campaign donation issue reopened (Lyle Denniston, February 19, 2013)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
11/12/2012 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 17, 2012) |
11/23/2012 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including January 16, 2012. |
11/29/2012 | Waiver of right of respondent Stockbridge-Munsee Community, Band of Mohican Indians, Putative Intervenor to respond filed. |
12/14/2012 | Brief amicus curiae of New York filed. |
12/17/2012 | Brief amici curiae of Cayuga County, New York, and Seneca County, New York filed. |
12/17/2012 | Brief amici curiae of Citizens Equal Rights Foundation, et al. filed. |
01/16/2013 | Brief of respondents Oneida Indian Nation of New York in opposition filed. |
01/29/2013 | Reply of petitioners Madison County and Oneida County, New York filed. (Distributed) |
01/30/2013 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 15, 2013. |
02/19/2013 | The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States. Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. |
06/05/2013 | Letter of June 3, 2013, from counsel for petitioners received. |
12/13/2013 | Letter of December 13, 2013, from counsel for petitioners received. |
03/11/2014 | Motion to dismiss the petition for a writ of certiorari pursuant to Rule 46 received. |
03/26/2014 | Petition Dismissed - Rule 46. |