Skip to content

Petitions of the week

By
oSC140325wide_wide_preview

This week we highlight petitions pending before the Supreme Court that address the applicability of the government edicts doctrine to works that lack the force of law, the scope of a corporate issuers duty to update under Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5(b), and the ability of a nonsignatory to an arbitration agreement to compel arbitration under the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards.

Thepetitions of the week are:

18-1010

Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should resolve the circuit split regarding a corporate issuers duty to update under Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5(b) and find that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit erred by imposing such a duty to a statement of historical fact that was accurate when made, when the value or weight of that prior statement was later diminished by subsequent events.

18-1048

Issue: Whether the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards permits a nonsignatory to an arbitration agreement to compel arbitration based on the doctrine of equitable estoppel.

18-1150
Disclosure: Vinson & Elkins LLP, whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case. Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel to the respondent in this case. This listing occurs without regard to the likelihood that certiorari will be granted.

Issue:Whether the government edicts doctrine extends toand thus renders uncopyrightableworks that lack the force of law, such as the annotations in the Official Code of Georgia Annotated.

Cases: Hagan v. Khoja, GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v. Outokumpu Stainless USA LLC, Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org Inc.

Recommended Citation: Aurora Barnes, Petitions of the week, SCOTUSblog (Apr. 12, 2019, 12:00 AM), https://www.scotusblog.com/2019/04/petitions-of-the-week-39/