Petitions of the week
This week we highlight petitions pending before the Supreme Court that address the statute of limitations that applies to relators in a qui tam action, the cause requirement to force entry into a home to arrest a suspect, and the question of whether the transformative use of a copyrighted work can be a cognizable market harm.
Thepetitions of the week are:
Issue:Whether a relator in a False Claims Act qui tam action may rely on the statute of limitations in 31 U.S.C. 3731(b)(2) in a suit in which the United States has declined to intervene and, if so, whether the relator constitutes an official of the United States for purposes of Section 3731(b)(2).
Issue:Whether the transformative use of a copyrighted work can cause a cognizable market harm under 17 U.S.C. 107(4) if it is used in connection with a commercially successful business that the author is unlikely to enter or authorize.
Issue:Whether the Fourth Amendment requires police officers to have probable cause to believe that a suspect is present in a home before forcing entry into that home to execute an arrest warrant for the suspect.
Posted in Cases in the Pipeline
Cases: Cochise Consultancy Inc. v. United States, ex rel. Hunt, TVEyes Inc. v. Fox News Network, LLC, Harper v. Leahy