Breaking News

Soto v. United States

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
24-320 Fed. Cir. TBD TBD TBD TBD OT 2024

Issue: Given the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s holding that a claim for compensation under 10 U.S.C. § 1413a is a claim “involving … retired pay” under 31 U.S.C. § 3702(a)(1)(A), does 10 U.S.C. § 1413a provide a settlement mechanism that displaces the default procedures and limitations set forth in the Barring Act?

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Sep 18 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 21, 2024)
Oct 16 2024Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 21, 2024 to November 20, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
Oct 17 2024Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 20, 2024.
Oct 21 2024Brief amicus curiae of National Law School Veterans Clinic Consortium filed.
Nov 20 2024Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
Dec 03 2024Reply of petitioner Simon A. Soto filed. (Dec.10, 2024) (Distributed)
Dec 04 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025.
Jan 13 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/17/2025.
Jan 17 2025Petition GRANTED limited to the following Question: Given the Federal Circuit's holding that a claim for compensation under 10 U. S. C. §1413a is a claim "involving ... retired pay" under 31 U. S. C. §3702(a)(l)(A), does 10 U. S. C. §1413a provide a settlement mechanism that displaces the default procedures and limitations set forth in the Barring Act?