Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
24-320 | Fed. Cir. | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD | OT 2024 |
Issue: Given the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s holding that a claim for compensation under 10 U.S.C. § 1413a is a claim “involving … retired pay” under 31 U.S.C. § 3702(a)(1)(A), does 10 U.S.C. § 1413a provide a settlement mechanism that displaces the default procedures and limitations set forth in the Barring Act?
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Sep 18 2024 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 21, 2024) |
Oct 16 2024 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 21, 2024 to November 20, 2024, submitted to The Clerk. |
Oct 17 2024 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 20, 2024. |
Oct 21 2024 | Brief amicus curiae of National Law School Veterans Clinic Consortium filed. |
Nov 20 2024 | Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed. |
Dec 03 2024 | Reply of petitioner Simon A. Soto filed. (Dec.10, 2024) (Distributed) |
Dec 04 2024 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025. |
Jan 13 2025 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/17/2025. |
Jan 17 2025 | Petition GRANTED limited to the following Question: Given the Federal Circuit's holding that a claim for compensation under 10 U. S. C. §1413a is a claim "involving ... retired pay" under 31 U. S. C. §3702(a)(l)(A), does 10 U. S. C. §1413a provide a settlement mechanism that displaces the default procedures and limitations set forth in the Barring Act? |