WHAT WE'RE READING
The morning read for Tuesday, January 9
![](https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/IMG_0947-1.jpg)
on Jan 9, 2024 at 6:07 am
![](https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Banner201130.jpg)
The court will hear oral argument this morning in Sheetz v. County of El Dorado, California and Office of the U.S. Trustee v. John Q. Hammons Fall 2006, LLC. Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. Here’s the Monday morning read:
- Supreme Court Appears Split Over Notice Requirements for Immigration Court (Abbie VanSickle, The New York Times)
- US supreme court rejects big oil’s bid to move Minnesota climate trial (Dharna Noor, The Guardian)
- 5 ways the Supreme Court may try to defuse its newest Trump bomb (Josh Gerstein, Politico)
- Why Have States Diverged on Trump’s Ballot Eligibility? (Ciara Torres-Spelliscy, State Court Report)
- U.S. Supreme Court Declines Bid to Rename ‘Brown v. Board of Education’ (Mark Walsh, Education Week)