| Docket No. | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22-5785 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2021 |
Issue: (1) Whether, under the ruling in Shinn v. Ramirez, state courts are required to accept and rule on the merits of claims presented in writs of habeas corpus by prisoners who lawfully dismiss their attorneys to be incompliance with state procedures and file the claims pro se because the attorneys neglected or refused to do so; (2) whether unindicted actors can be added into an accused's jury charge when his indictment charges him as the only actor to commit the offense; and (3) whether it is constitutional for a grand jury to sign off on an indictment when the elements of the offense sought are not satisfied or could not have been satisfied by the government to begin with.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| Aug 21 2022 | Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 7, 2022) |
| Oct 28 2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 7, 2022 to December 7, 2022, submitted to The Clerk. |
| Oct 31 2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 7, 2022. |
| Nov 04 2022 | Application (22A486) for a stay, submitted to Justice Alito. |
| Dec 06 2022 | Brief of respondent Texas in opposition filed. |
| Dec 06 2022 | Response to application from respondent Texas filed. |
| Dec 13 2022 | Reply of petitioner Robert Alan Fratta filed. |
| Dec 22 2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023. |
| Jan 09 2023 | Petition DENIED. |
| Jan 09 2023 | Application (22A486) referred to the Court. |
| Jan 09 2023 | Application (22A486) for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the Court is denied. |
