Apple Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated
Petition for certiorari denied on June 27, 2022
Issue: Whether a licensee has Article III standing to challenge the validity of a patent covered by a license
agreement that covers multiple patents. CVSG: 5/24/2022
Date | Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) |
---|
Sep 03 2021 | Application (21A39) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 18, 2021 to November 17, 2021, submitted to The Chief Justice. |
Sep 09 2021 | Application (21A39) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until November 17, 2021. |
Nov 17 2021 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 20, 2021) |
Dec 02 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 20, 2021 to January 19, 2022, submitted to The Clerk. |
Dec 03 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 19, 2022. |
Dec 17 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Engine Advocacy, et al. filed. |
Dec 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Senator Patrick Leahy and Congressman Darrell Issa filed. |
Dec 20 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Unified Patents, LLC filed. |
Dec 20 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Thales filed. |
Jan 19 2022 | Brief of respondent Qualcomm Incorporated in opposition filed. |
Feb 01 2022 | Reply of petitioner Apple Inc. filed. (Distributed) |
Feb 02 2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022. |
Feb 22 2022 | The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States. |
May 24 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. |
Jun 06 2022 | Supplemental brief of petitioner Apple Inc. filed. (Distributed) |
Jun 07 2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/23/2022. |
Jun 27 2022 | Petition DENIED. |