Deasey v. Slater
Petition for certiorari denied on October 13, 2020
Issue: Whether, for
purposes of qualified immunity, a merely “sufficiently
analogous” case is enough to show that the law is
“clearly established,” or whether something more is required,
i.e., a “closely analogous” case finding the alleged violation unlawful.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) |
|---|
| Mar 02 2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 3, 2020) |
| Apr 15 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/1/2020. |
| Apr 29 2020 | Response Requested. (Due May 29, 2020) |
| May 20 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 29, 2020 to June 29, 2020, submitted to The Clerk. |
| May 21 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 29, 2020. |
| Jun 25 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 29, 2020 to July 29, 2020, submitted to The Clerk. |
| Jun 26 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including July 29, 2020. |
| Jul 21 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 29, 2020 to August 28, 2020, submitted to The Clerk. |
| Jul 22 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 28, 2020. |
| Aug 28 2020 | Brief of respondents Daniella Slater, et al. in opposition filed. |
| Sep 14 2020 | Reply of petitioners Deputy Shannon Deasey, Deputy Peter Gentry, Deputy Gary Brandt, Sgt. Mike Rude, and County of San Bernardino filed. (Distributed) |
| Sep 16 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020. |
| Oct 13 2020 | Petition DENIED. |
