General Electric Co. v. United Technologies Corp.
Petition for certiorari denied on May 26, 2020
Issue: Whether competitive harm alone suffices to confer
Article III standing to appeal an inter partes
review determination,
or whether an appellant must also show concrete
plans for future activity that creates a substantial
risk of a future patent infringement action.
Date | Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) |
---|
Dec 31 2019 | Application (19A727) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 13, 2020 to February 12, 2020, submitted to The Chief Justice. |
Jan 06 2020 | Application (19A727) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until February 12, 2020. |
Feb 12 2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 16, 2020) |
Mar 06 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 16, 2020 to April 15, 2020, submitted to The Clerk. |
Mar 10 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 15, 2020. |
Mar 16 2020 | Brief amicus curiae of Frontier Communications Corporation filed. |
Mar 16 2020 | Brief amici curiae of Unified Patents, LLC; Engine Advocacy; Cable Television Laboratories, Inc.; The R Street Institute; and The Niskanen Center filed. |
Apr 10 2020 | Letter of April 6, 2020, received from counsel for the respondent. |
Apr 15 2020 | Brief of respondent Raytheon Technologies Corporation, fka United Technologies Corporation in opposition filed. |
May 05 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020. |
May 05 2020 | Reply of petitioner General Electric Company filed. (Distributed) |
May 26 2020 | Petition DENIED. Justice Breyer and Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. |