Karingithi v. Barr
Petition for certiorari denied on February 24, 2020
Issues: (1) Whether the government may commence removal
proceedings by serving a noncitizen with a “notice to
appear” that fails to specify the hearing’s time and
place; and (2) whether deference under Auer v. Robbins allows an executive agency
to interpret a regulation in a way that conflicts with
a congressional statute.
Date | Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) |
---|
Jul 23 2019 | Application (19A104) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 6, 2019 to October 5, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan. |
Jul 23 2019 | Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system. |
Jul 25 2019 | Application (19A104) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until October 7, 2019. |
Oct 07 2019 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 12, 2019) |
Oct 30 2019 | Brief amicus curiae of Lonny Hoffman filed. |
Nov 12 2019 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 12, 2019 to December 12, 2019, submitted to The Clerk. |
Nov 14 2019 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 12, 2019. |
Dec 11 2019 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 12, 2019 to January 13, 2020, submitted to The Clerk. |
Dec 12 2019 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including January 13, 2020. |
Jan 13 2020 | Brief of respondent Barr, William in opposition filed. |
Jan 29 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020. |
Jan 29 2020 | Reply of petitioner Serah Karingithi filed. |
Feb 24 2020 | Petition DENIED. |