Linked with:
| Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12-1055 | DC Cir. | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2012 |
Issue: (1) Whether prudential standing is jurisdictional, as the D.C., Second, and Sixth Circuits have held, or whether it is non-jurisdictional and can be conceded or waived by a defending party, as the Fifth, Seventh, Ninth, Tenth, and Federal Circuits have held; (2) whether, when Congress enacts a comprehensive and integrated statute governing a single subject matter, a group of petitioners whose interests Congress expressly identified and protected are in the “zone of interests” of that statute and therefore have prudential standing to challenge an agency decision issued under it; and (3) whether regulated industries have constitutional standing to challenge a rule that, as an integral part of a comprehensive regulatory scheme, imposes substantial new burdens on those industries.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| Feb 21 2013 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 29, 2013) |
| Mar 19 2013 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including May 13, 2013, for all respondents. |
| Mar 29 2013 | Brief amici curiae of Oklahoma, et al. filed. |
| Mar 29 2013 | Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed. VIDED. |
| May 6 2013 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including May 24, 2013, for all respondents. |
| May 24 2013 | Brief of the Federal Respondent in opposition filed. VIDED. |
| May 24 2013 | Brief of respondent Growth Energy in opposition filed. VIDED. |
| May 28 2013 | Letter of May 28, 2013, from counsel for respondents Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, et al. received. |
| Jun 3 2013 | Reply of petitioner Grocery Manufacturers Association, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
| Jun 4 2013 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 20, 2013. |
| Jun 24 2013 | Petition DENIED. |
