WHAT WE'RE READING
The morning read for Wednesday, December 27
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c55e/4c55eb93b517b45f4fd3c3f2a1e84cff9c1fb08f" alt=""
on Dec 27, 2023 at 7:17 am
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f95b2/f95b28d10cc8a81682325895c9afcfe1db21706b" alt=""
Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. Here’s the Wednesday morning read:
- How Supreme Court Practice Has Changed (and Stayed the Same) Headed Into 2024 (Jimmy Hoover, The National Law Journal)
- What the Supreme Court Will Do with Trump’s Colorado Ballot Disqualification (Dahlia Lithwick & Jeremy Stahl, Slate)
- The Supreme Court’s refusal to expedite Trump’s immunity claim could make or break the 2024 election (Austin Sarat, The Hill)
- Clarence Thomas’s Clerks: An ‘Extended Family’ With Reach and Power (Abbie VanSickle & Steve Eder, The New York Times)
- Supreme Court’s Decisions Loom Over Consumer Watchdog’s 2024 Plans (Evan Weinberger, Bloomberg Law)