WHAT WE'RE READING
The morning read for Tuesday, May 23
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c55e/4c55eb93b517b45f4fd3c3f2a1e84cff9c1fb08f" alt=""
on May 23, 2023 at 10:22 am
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15570/1557003cb65f96707c9d9e2be17c72e5fc3727b2" alt=""
Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. Here’s the Tuesday morning read:
- US Supreme Court’s Andy Warhol decision keeps ‘fair use’ questions alive (Blake Brittain, Reuters)
- Top Court’s Pork-Producer Ruling Could Affect Abortion-Pill Suit (Mary Anne Pazanowski, Bloomberg Law)
- What It’s Like After the Supreme Court Rules Your Child’s Death Doesn’t Count (Shirin Ali, Slate)
- DeSantis envisions shaping ‘7-2 conservative majority’ on Supreme Court (Hannah Knowles, The Washington Post)
- How a Supreme Court decision went from red to blue in less than 2 decades (Alan Hurst, Deseret News)