WHAT WE'RE READING
The morning read for Tuesday, March 7
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c55e/4c55eb93b517b45f4fd3c3f2a1e84cff9c1fb08f" alt=""
on Mar 7, 2023 at 9:53 am
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15570/1557003cb65f96707c9d9e2be17c72e5fc3727b2" alt=""
Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. Here’s the Tuesday morning read:
- Supreme Court allows atheists’ lawsuit against Florida city over prayer vigil to continue (Tierney Sneed, Devan Cole, & Ariane de Vogue, CNN)
- U.S. Supreme Court won’t decide scope of wage-and-hour class actions (Daniel Wiessner, Reuters)
- Confusion Shrouds High Court Election Case With 2024 on Horizon (Kimberly Strawbridge Robinson, Bloomberg Law)
- Why a sweeping election law clash at the Supreme Court could disappear (Zach Schonfeld , The Hill)
- Street near Miami named for Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson (Freida Frisaro, Associated Press)