WHAT WE'RE READING
The morning read for Monday, March 27
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c55e/4c55eb93b517b45f4fd3c3f2a1e84cff9c1fb08f" alt=""
on Mar 27, 2023 at 9:34 am
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15570/1557003cb65f96707c9d9e2be17c72e5fc3727b2" alt=""
Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. Here’s the Monday morning read:
- ‘Racist taint.’ Will the Supreme Court review a Jim Crow-era voting ban targeted at Black Mississippians? (John Fritze, USA Today)
- Explainer: What happens if the US Supreme Court bans affirmative action? (Joseph Ax, Reuters)
- Amgen Seeks to Monopolize Nature (Gregory Winter, The Wall Street Journal)
- Navajo Nation Isn’t Asking the Supreme Court For Much (Yvette Borja, Balls & Strikes)
- Supreme Court affirmative action case adds urgency to push to end legacy admissions at colleges (Hilary Burns, The Boston Globe)