WHAT WE'RE READING
The morning read for Friday, Feb. 24
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c55e/4c55eb93b517b45f4fd3c3f2a1e84cff9c1fb08f" alt=""
on Feb 24, 2023 at 9:54 am
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15570/1557003cb65f96707c9d9e2be17c72e5fc3727b2" alt=""
Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. Here’s the Friday morning read:
- Supreme Court Tackles Fraud Among Business Partners, Not Spouses (James Nani, Bloomberg Law)
- The Supreme Court Needs to Rein In the Surveillance State (Patrick C. Toomey, The Nation)
- Section 230, the internet law that’s under threat, explained (Sara Morrison, Vox)
- Google and Twitter Supreme Court Cases Won’t Gut Section 230 (Stephen L. Carter, Bloomberg)
- Republican Attorneys General Are Telling the Supreme Court What It Wants to Hear (Yvette Borja, Balls & Strikes)