Monday round-up

At CNN, Ariane de Vogue reports that [t]heSupreme Courthasclosed its doors to the publicuntil “further notice” as the impact ofthe coronavirus pandemicripples across the country, raising questions about how the justices will handle the next set of oral arguments scheduled to begin March 23. This blogs publisher Tom Goldstein considers the courts options, writing that past practice and the nature of the virus suggest that the justices should issue an order deferring the March oral argument calendar and see how circumstances develop.

Briefly:

• At NJOnlineGambling, John Brennan notes that [t]he six-year legal battle over sports betting between New Jersey and five major sports organizations” now has a sequel: a request that the Supreme Court weigh in on the two-year-old effort by New Jerseys thoroughbred horsemen to collect up to $150 million in damages due to a four-year delay in Monmouth Parks ability to conduct such sports betting.
• In the latest episode of Bloomberg Laws Cases and Controversies podcast, Kimberly Robinson and Jordan Rubin discuss two cases scheduled for argument later this month over whether Congressional committees and Manhattan prosecutors can get their hands on the presidents financial recordsincluding his tax returns.
• The latest episode of the Heritage Foundations SCOTUS 101 podcast offers the George W. Bush Presidential Library’s interview with Justice Neil Gorsuch.
• At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost maintains that the Supreme Court’s order last week reviving the government’s “remain in Mexico” immigration policy “illustrates, yet again, that when the Trump administration says jump, the Roberts Court is quite willing to answer, ‘How high?'”

We relyon our readers to send us links for our round-up.If you have or know of a recent (published in the last two or three days) article, post, podcast or op-ed relating to the Supreme Court that youd like us to consider for inclusion in the round-up, please send it to roundup [at] scotusblog.com. Thank you!