In its Conference of June 9, 2016, the Court will consider petitions involving issues such as whether Johnson v. United States announced a new substantive rule of constitutional law that applies retroactively on collateral review to challenges of sentences imposed under the residual clause in United States Sentencing Guidelines career offender provision; whether capital defense counsel may decide to present evidence of a single mitigating factor without having first conducted a thorough investigation of other potential mitigating factors; and whether a court must categorically deny a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) motion premised on the change in decisional law produced by Martinez v. Ryan.
[PAGE]15-862[/PAGE]
[PAGE]15-1193[/PAGE]
[PAGE]15-7848[/PAGE]
[PAGE]15-8544[/PAGE]
[PAGE]15-8629[/PAGE]
[PAGE]15-982[/PAGE]
CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY