Petitions to watch | Conference of December 11
on Dec 4, 2015 at 11:00 pm
In its Conference of December 11, 2015, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as whether the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority’s rejection of a controversial pro-Israel ad violated the First Amendment and whether the Federal Arbitration Act preempts a California law categorically exempting representative Private Attorney General Act actions from mandatory arbitration.
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features petitions raising issues that Tom has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues. Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case.
[PAGE]15-420[/PAGE]
[PAGE]15-363[/PAGE]
[PAGE]15-236[/PAGE]
[PAGE]15-141[/PAGE]
[PAGE]15-57[/PAGE]
Relists
[PAGE]14-1372[/PAGE]
[PAGE]14-1468[/PAGE]
[PAGE]14-1470[/PAGE]
[PAGE]14-10008[/PAGE]
[PAGE]14-10078[/PAGE]
[PAGE]14-10376[/PAGE]
[PAGE]14-10423[/PAGE]
[PAGE]15-58[/PAGE]
[PAGE]15-169[/PAGE]
[PAGE]15-214[/PAGE]
[PAGE]15-290[/PAGE]
[PAGE]15-338[/PAGE]
[PAGE]15-339[/PAGE]
