Petition of the day
By Maureen Johnston
on May 29, 2014
Thepetition of the dayis:
13-1165
Issue:(1) Whether alternative holdings, each independently sufficient to sustain a judgment, all have preclusive effect in subsequent proceedings, as the Second, Third, Ninth, Eleventh, and D.C. Circuits hold, or whether none of them do, as the Fourth, Seventh, Tenth, and Federal Circuits hold; and (2) whether the mandate rule bars a party from relitigating an issue in the same case that was within the scope of a decision that was unequivocally affirmed.
Posted in Cases in the Pipeline
Cases: Cisco Systems, Inc. v. TecSec, Inc.
Recommended Citation:
Maureen Johnston,
Petition of the day,
SCOTUSblog (May. 29, 2014, 12:00 AM),
https://www.scotusblog.com/2014/05/petition-of-the-day-617/