Tuesday round-up

At Jost on Justice, Ken Jost weighs in on last week’s oral arguments in Town of Greece v. Galloway, the legislative prayer case, arguing that, although “[t]he justices may be tempted to keep the court out of this controversy, . . . only the courts can protect the religious liberties of religious minorities when they are ignored by the religious majority.”  And at Sightings, Martin E. Marty discusses some of the questions posed by the case:  he characterizes “[t]he main preliminary arguments to the Supreme Court for prayers, as voiced last Wednesday, . . .  [as] ‘we’ve always done that before.’ Or ‘we’re bigger’n you are.’”  If so, he continues, “who are the ‘we?’ . . . Before long in any number of communities Muslims will outnumber many other constituencies. What will the people whose only case is that ‘we and our God were here first, and that we set historical precedents’ have to say and do?”

Briefly:

Posted in: Round-up

CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY