As Lyle reported yesterday for this blog, the California Supreme Court has declined to revive that state’s ban on same-sex marriage – the measure at the center of last Term’s decision in Hollingsworth v. Perry, in which the U.S. Supreme Court held that the ban’s defenders lacked the legal right to defend it on appeal. Other coverage of the California court’s order comes from Maura Dolan of the Los Angeles Times and Chris Geidner of BuzzFeed.
Yesterday the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied rehearing in a challenge to the constitutionality of the “birth control mandate” – a provision in the Affordable Care Act which requires employers to provide their employees with health insurance that includes access to family planning. Attorneys for the Pennsylvania company challenging the mandate have already announced that they will ask the Supreme Court to weigh in. Lyle Denniston covers these developments for this blog; other coverage comes from Sam Baker of The Hill.
Briefly:
Disclosure: Tejinder Singh of the law firm of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in Perry. However, the author of this post is not affiliated with the law firm.
CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY