Thursday round-up

At this blog, Lyle Denniston discusses nine pending cert. petitions regarding new EPA rules on greenhouse gases and observes that the petitions “could either turn into one of the biggest regulatory cases the Court has had in years, or could go nowhere because of the argument that the Supreme Court has already all but resolved the dispute.” Also at this blog, Amy Howe discusses the prospect that Burnside v. Walters, in which the Court recently granted cert. to address the interpretation of 28 U.S.C. § 1915, which allows indigent plaintiffs to file their lawsuits in forma pauperis, could return to the Sixth Circuit without a ruling on the merits by the Supreme Court.

 

Briefly:

Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to Representative F. James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in Shelby County v. Holder.

 If you have (or know of) a recent article or post that you would like to have included in the round-up, please send a link to roundup [at] scotusblog.com so that we can consider it.

Posted in: Round-up

CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY