Petitions to watch | Conference of January 4, 2013
At its January 4, 2013 Conference, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as the authority of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act, the definition of “hot pursuit,” and rights under the Labor-Management Relations Act.
Thiseditionof Petitions to watch features petitions raising issues that Tom has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues. Our policy is to include and discloseall cases in which Goldstein & Russell,P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case,with the exception of the rarecases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case.
[PAGE]11-798[/PAGE]
[PAGE]11-889[/PAGE]
[PAGE]11-1154[/PAGE]
[PAGE]11-1278[/PAGE]
[PAGE]12-99[/PAGE]
[PAGE]12-117[/PAGE]
[PAGE]12-140[/PAGE]
[PAGE]12-158[/PAGE]
[PAGE]12-167[/PAGE]
[PAGE]12-215[/PAGE]
[PAGE]12-218[/PAGE]
[PAGE]12-223[/PAGE]
[PAGE]12-230[/PAGE]
[PAGE]12-276[/PAGE]
[PAGE]12-296[/PAGE]
[PAGE]12-311[/PAGE]
[PAGE]12-312[/PAGE]
[PAGE]12-315[/PAGE]
[PAGE]12-322[/PAGE]
[PAGE]12-330[/PAGE]
[PAGE]12-348[/PAGE]
[PAGE]12-379[/PAGE]
[PAGE]12-382[/PAGE]
[PAGE]12-389[/PAGE]
[PAGE]12-399[/PAGE]
[PAGE]12-414[/PAGE]
[PAGE]12-444[/PAGE]
[PAGE]12-445[/PAGE]
[PAGE]12-454[/PAGE]
[PAGE]12-496[/PAGE]
[PAGE]12-515[/PAGE]
[PAGE]12-532[/PAGE]
[PAGE]12-563[/PAGE]
Posted in Cases in the Pipeline