With the Court’s November sitting beginning next week, coverage focuses on next Monday’s argument in Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, in which the Court will consider whether copyrighted works purchased abroad can be resold within the United States without the copyright owner’s permission. At Slate, John Villasenor summarizes the issues raised by the case, and he concludes that the Court might “make copyright law even more restrictive.” Andrew Albanese of Publishers Weekly reports on efforts by library associations to support petitioner Supap Kirtsaeng, while Marketa Trimble contends at the Technology & Marketing Law Blog that the statutory language at issue allows the Court to make a free policy choice between different principles of copyright exhaustion.
The Court will also hear argument on Monday in Clapper v. Amnesty International USA, in which it will consider whether plaintiffs challenging warrantless wiretapping under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Amendments Act of 2008 have standing, when they cannot prove that they will be monitored. Writing at Politico, Bill Binney and J. Kirk Wiebe argue that the Court should find standing and allow the courts to determine the constitutionality of warrantless wiretapping. Josh Bell of the ACLU’s Blog of Rights also has commentary on the case.
Briefly:
CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY