This edition of “Petitions to watch†features cases up for consideration at the Justices’ November 23 conference. These are petitions raising issues that Tom has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues.
[PETITION]10-18[/PETITION]
[PETITION]10-86[/PETITION]
[PETITION]10-150[/PETITION]
[PETITION]10-180[/PETITION]
[PETITION]10-235[/PETITION]
[PETITION]10-238[/PETITION]
[PETITION]10-239[/PETITION]
[PETITION]10-277[/PETITION]
[PETITION]10-283[/PETITION]
[PETITION]10-284[/PETITION]
[PETITION]10-288[/PETITION]
[PETITION]10-290[/PETITION]
[PETITION]10-300[/PETITION]
[PETITION]10-386[/PETITION]
[PETITION]10-389[/PETITION]
[PETITION]10-415[/PETITION]
[PETITION]10-430[/PETITION]
_________________________________________________________________
DISCLOSURE:Â Akin Gump and Howe & Russell represent one of the parties in the case below; the case is listed here without regard to its chances of being granted.
[PETITION]09-1576[/PETITION]
_________________________________________________________________
The following petitions have been re-listed for the conference of November 23. Â If any other paid petitions are re-distributed for this conference, we will add them below as soon as their re-distribution is noted on the docket.
[PETITION]09-1395[/PETITION]
[PETITION]09-1555[/PETITION]
[PETITION]10-24[/PETITION]
[PETITION]10-94[/PETITION]
CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY