Yesterday the Court heard oral argument in Skinner v. Switzer and Kasten v. Saint-Gobain. Transcripts of the arguments are available here.
In Skinner, the Court is considering whether a convicted prisoner seeking access to DNA evidence can assert that claim in a civil rights action. CNN’s Bill Mears notes that the oral arguments “stayed away from the specifics of the crime and subsequent trial,†and while Robert Barnes of the Washington Post similarly observes that “drama was missing†from the “technical†arguments. The New York Times, the Christian Science Monitor, USA Today, Courthouse News Service, JURIST, and the Associated Press  also have coverage of the arguments.  SCOTUSblog’s own Mary Fischer has a three-part series providing background on the case (Part 1, Part 2, Part 3). In Kasten, the Court is considering whether an oral complaint (as opposed to a written one) is protected under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Courthouse News Service, the Associated Press, and the National Law Journal all cover the oral argument, which focused on the meaning of the statute’s use of the word “file.â€
Snyder v. Phelps, last week’s First Amendment case, continues to generate commentary. At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost argues that the Court should not carve out an exception to First Amendment protection for military funerals, emphasizing that “the ruling that punishes the Phelpses today may punish more worthy speakers tomorrow.†At the Witherspoon Institute’s Public Discourse blog, Hadley Arkes argues that the Justices “began to back into the reasoning†of “the classic case of Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire†during oral argument.
Briefly:
CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY