Special-edition round-up: United States v. Stevens

This morning, the Court handed down its opinion in United States v. Stevens (08-769), striking down as overly broad a law which criminalized the creation or sale of depictions of animal cruelty.  [DISCLAIMER: Akin Gump represented the respondent in the case.]  In addition to Lyle Denniston’s analysis, published on this blog earlier today, a number of news sources have already begun reporting on the ruling, including the following (listed below the jump):

We’ll have more on the media response to United States v. Stevens, as well as links to commentary on the decision, in this week’s subsequent round-up posts.

Posted in: Round-up

CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY