In the Wall Street Journal, Mark H. Anderson reports here (subscription req’d) on today’s argument regarding standards for securities class-action lawsuits; AP writer Marcy Gordon has this article. At the WSJ.com Law Blog, Peter Lattman has this preview of Tellabs Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights Ltd; James P. Miller reports here in the Chicago Tribune. Yesterday, Jess Bravin and Lattman had this article (subscription req’d) in the Wall Street Journal discussing both Tellabs and Credit Suisse v. Billing.
Aaron Streett’s latest edition of “Supreme Court Today,” covering yesterday’s opinions and grants, is here. Paul Secunda of Workplace Prof Blog reports here on the Court’s decision in Rockwell.
In the Legal Times, Tony Mauro’s latest Courtside column is here, discussing Martin Garbus’s new book, “The Next 25 Years: The New Supreme Court and What It Means for Americans.”
At the Antitrust Review, Manfred Gabriel has this post on the forthcoming decision in Twombly and David Fischer has this analysis of the oral argument in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc.
Rick Hasen of Election Law Blog recently posted a draft of his paper, “The Untimely Death of Bush v. Gore,” here on SSRN.
At Concurring Opinions, Melissa Waters has this post on the Supreme Court’s decision last term in Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon and what it reveals about Chief Justice Roberts; and Alice Ristroph has this post discussing the Court’s opinions in Lochner v. New York and Jacobson v. Massachusetts and their relation to the state’s interest in preserving individual lives.
Here, at Sentencing Law and Policy, Doug Berman previews the Federal Sentencing Reporter’s latest issue, entitled “Claiborne & Rita: Reasonableness Review in the Supreme Court.”
CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY