Schultz v. Wescom
Petition for certiorari denied on December 15, 2014
Issue: (1) Whether the Ninth Circuit erred when it held - in conflict with the First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Tenth Circuits, but in accord with the Seventh Circuit - that a district court's order striking or refusing to consider a qualified immunity motion is not subject to interlocutory appeal, even when it subjects a public official to unlimited discovery for the duration of a lawsuit; and (2) whether petitioners are entitled to qualified immunity.
Date | Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) |
---|
Jul 16 2014 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 18, 2014) |
Jul 21 2014 | Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners. |
Aug 1 2014 | Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents |
Aug 11 2014 | Waiver of right of respondents Gage Wescom, et al. to respond filed. |
Aug 18 2014 | Brief amici curiae of The International Municipal Lawyers Association, and The National Association of Police Organizations filed. |
Aug 27 2014 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 29, 2014. |
Sep 3 2014 | Response Requested . (Due October 3, 2014) |
Sep 30 2014 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 3, 2014. |
Nov 3 2014 | Brief of respondents Gage Wescom, et al. in opposition filed. |
Nov 18 2014 | Reply of petitioners John Darren Schultz, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
Nov 19 2014 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 5, 2014. |
Dec 8 2014 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 12, 2014. |
Dec 15 2014 | Petition DENIED. |