Kurns v. Railroad Friction Products Corp.

Holding: Petitioners’ state-law design-defect and failure-to-warn claims fall within the field of locomotive equipment regulation pre-empted by the Locomotive Inspection Act, as that field was defined in Napier v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.

Judgment: Affirmed, 6-3, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on February 29, 2012. Justice Kagan filed a concurring opinion. Justice Sotomayor filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, which Justices Ginsburg and Breyer joined.

Briefs and Documents

Merits Briefs for Petitioners

• Brief for Gloria Gail Kurns et al.
• Reply brief for Gloria Gail Kurns et al.

Amicus Briefs in Support of the Petitioners

• Brief for the Academy of Rail Labor Attorneys
• Brief for the American Association for Justice
• Brief for the National Association of Retired and Veteran Railway Employees
• Brief for Public Justice, P.C.
• Brief for Public Law Scholars
• Brief for the United States

Merits Briefs for the Respondents

• Brief for Railroad Friction Products Corp. and Viad Corp.

Amicus Briefs in Support of the Respondents

• Brief for Thyssenkrupp Budd Company 
• Brief for the National Association of Manufacturers 
• Brief for General Electric Corporation 
• Brief for John Crane Inc. 
• Brief for Chamber of Commerce
• Brief for the Washington Legal Foundation
• Brief for DRI-The Voice of the Defense Bar 
• Brief for Griffin Wheel Company 
• Brief for the Association of American Railroads

Certiorari-stage Documents

• Petition for certiorari
• Brief in opposition for Railroad Friction Products Corp. (unavailable)
• Response to petition for VIAD
• Supplemental brief for respondent VIAD
• Supplemental brief for respondent Railroad Friction Products Corp. 

The supplemental briefs in this case make reference to the Solicitor General’s brief in Crane v. Atwell, which is available here.