Skip to content

Dunn v. Madison

Docket No. Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
17-193 Not Argued Nov 6, 2017 n/a Per Curiam OT 2017

Holding: Because the state court"s determinations of law and fact were not "so lacking in justification" as to give rise to error "beyond any possibility for fairminded disagreement," Vernon Madison"s claim to federal habeas relief must fail.

Judgment: Reversed in a per curiam opinion on November 6, 2017. Justice Ginsburg filed a concurring opinion, in which Justices Breyer and Sotomayor joined. Justice Breyer filed a concurring opinion.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
08/02/2017Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 5, 2017)
09/05/2017Brief of respondent Vernon Madison in opposition filed.
09/05/2017Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Vernon Madison.
09/14/2017Reply of petitioner Jefferson Dunn, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections filed.
09/20/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2017.
10/10/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/13/2017.
10/23/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/27/2017.
10/30/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/3/2017.
11/06/2017Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
11/06/2017Petition for certiorari GRANTED, judgment REVERSED. Opinion per curiam. (Detached Opinion). Justice Ginsburg, concurring. (Detached Opinion). Justice Breyer, concurring. (Detached Opinion).
11/16/2017Petition for Rehearing filed.
11/29/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2018.
01/08/2018Rehearing DENIED.
01/09/2018JUDGMENT ISSUED.