Breaking News

Department of State v. Muñoz

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
23-334 9th Cir. Apr 23, 2024
TBD TBD TBD OT 2023

Issues: (1) Whether a consular officer's refusal of a visa to a U.S. citizen's noncitizen spouse impinges upon a constitutionally protected interest of the citizen; and (2) whether, assuming that such a constitutional interest exists, notifying a visa applicant that he was deemed inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(3)(A)(ii) suffices to provide any process that is due.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Sep 29 2023Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 30, 2023)
Sep 29 2023Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.
Oct 17 2023Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 30, 2023 to November 29, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
Oct 18 2023Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 29, 2023.
Nov 28 2023Brief of respondents Sandra Munoz, et al. in opposition filed.
Dec 13 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
Dec 13 2023Reply of petitioners Department of State, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Jan 08 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/12/2024.
Jan 12 2024Petition GRANTED limited to Questions 1 and 2 presented by the petition.
Jan 12 2024As Rule 34.6 provides, “If the Court schedules briefing and oral argument in a case that was governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c) or Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 49.1(c), the parties shall submit electronic versions of all prior and subsequent filings with this Court in the case, subject to [applicable] redaction rules.” Subsequent party and amicus filings in the case should now be submitted through the Court’s electronic filing system, with any necessary redactions.
Feb 16 2024SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, April 23, 2024.
Feb 20 2024Brief of petitioners Department of State, et al. filed.
Feb 20 2024Joint appendix filed.
Feb 21 2024Record requested from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Feb 26 2024Brief amicus curiae of Immigration Reform Law Institute filed.
Mar 21 2024Brief of respondents Sandra Munoz, et al. filed.
Mar 27 2024CIRCULATED
Mar 27 2024Brief amicus curiae of HIAS Inc. filed. (Distributed)
Mar 27 2024Brief amicus curiae of Public Citizen filed. (Distributed)
Mar 28 2024Brief amici curiae of International Refugee Assistance Project, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Mar 28 2024Brief amici curiae of 35 Members of Congress filed. (Distributed)
Mar 28 2024Brief amici curiae of ACLU, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Mar 28 2024Brief amici curiae of United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
Mar 28 2024Brief amici curiae of The American Immigration Lawyers Association and The American Immigration Council filed. (Distributed)
Mar 28 2024Brief amici curiae of Former Consular Officers filed. (Distributed)
Mar 28 2024Brief amici curiae of Migrant Rights Initiative, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Mar 28 2024Brief amici curiae of Immigration Law and History Scholars filed. (Distributed)
Mar 28 2024Brief amici curiae of Professors and Scholars filed. (Distributed)
Mar 28 2024Brief amicus curiae of HEAL Refugee Health and Asylum Collaborative filed. (Distributed)
Mar 28 2024Brief amici curiae of Former Department of Homeland Security Officials filed. (Distributed)
Mar 28 2024Brief amici curiae of Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Mar 28 2024Brief amicus curiae of The American Bar Association filed. (Distributed)
Apr 02 2024Record received electronically from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and available with the Clerk.
Apr 12 2024Reply of petitioners Department of State, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Apr 23 2024Argued. For petitioners: Curtis E. Gannon, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Eric T. Lee, Southfeld, Mich.