Linked with:
| Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12-1167 | D.C. Cir. | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2012 |
Issue: (1) Whether engine manufacturers have standing under Article III because they demonstrated that the Clean Air Act's waiver for the fuel additive "E15" (15% ethanol/85% gasoline) will cause them injury in fact; (2) whether prudential standing is non-jurisdictional and therefore can be waived by a government agency’s (here, EPA’s) failure to raise it; and (3) whether, in assessing a regulated entity’s Article III standing to challenge regulatory action, an apparent “option” to comply with a statutory scheme should be viewed as coercive if use of the “option” is practically required.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| Mar 25 2013 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 25, 2013) |
| Mar 29 2013 | Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed. VIDED. |
| Apr 9 2013 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including May 13, 2013, for all respondents. |
| Apr 15 2013 | Response in Support of Certiorari Review from respondents Grocery Manufacturers Association, American Petroleum Association, et al. filed. |
| Apr 25 2013 | Brief amicus curiae of Public Citizen, Inc. filed. |
| May 6 2013 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including May 24, 2013, for all respondents. |
| May 24 2013 | Brief of the Federal Respondent in opposition filed. VIDED. |
| May 24 2013 | Brief of respondent Growth Energy in opposition filed. VIDED. |
| Jun 3 2013 | Reply of petitioners Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, et al. filed. |
| Jun 4 2013 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 20, 2013. |
| Jun 24 2013 | Petition DENIED. |
