Allshouse v. Pennsylvania
Disclosure: Goldstein, Howe & Russell represent the petitioner.
Issue: Whether a child's statements in an interview with a child protection agency worker investigating suspicions of past abuse are “testimonial†evidence subject to the demands of the Confrontation Clause under Crawford v. Washington (2004).
Judgment: Granted, Vacated, Remanded on March 7, 2011. for further consideration in light of Michigan v. Bryant, 562 U.S. ___ (2011)
Briefs and Documents
Certiorari-stage documents
