Breaking News
ARGUMENT ANALYSIS

Justices debate particularity of complaint in NVIDIA securities fraud suit

at 11:48 a.m.

The Supreme Court heard arguments on Wednesday in a dispute over the standard for evidence in a securities fraud class action based on allegedly false statements. The dispute involves statements by NVIDIA about the extent to which its profits depended on sales to the volatile crypto-mining market. For the most part, the justices who spoke seemed to think the dispute was too fact-specific to warrant their attention.

Supreme Court building with fall foliage

Wednesday’s argument was the second of two cases the justices heard this month involving securities fraud suits against major tech companies. (Katie Barlow)

SCOTUS NEWS

Supreme Court rejects Mark Meadows’ appeal in 2020 election interference case

 at 11:09 a.m.

The justices turned down a plea from former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, rejecting his effort to move his 2020 election interference charges in Georgia to federal court where he hoped to argue that, as a “federal officer,” he was immune from prosecution. The court also turned down a group of landlords’ challenges to New York’s rent stabilization laws. The court did not add any new cases to its docket for the current term.

PETITIONS OF THE WEEK

FCC asks court to uphold constitutionality of nationwide rural phone and internet subsidies

at 12:07 p.m.

A weekly look at new and notable petitions seeking Supreme Court review. This week: The Federal Communications Commission asks the justices to uphold the constitutionality of its Universal Service Fund, the initiative that provides cheaper rates for phone and internet access to remote areas, low-income families, and public schools and libraries.

ARGUMENT ANALYSIS

Justices skeptical about Facebook’s data breach disclosure to investors

 at 12:12 p.m.

In a dispute over whether a forward-looking risk disclosure that Facebook made to investors about data breaches was misleading when it did not disclose that Cambridge Analytica had already taken the private data of 30 million users, several of the justices were skeptical of Facebook’s position. But at least three of the court’s conservatives were sympathetic to the argument that because the disclosure was about future events, it was not misleading.

Advocates in Conversation