Friday round-up

Briefly:

• At the Washington Legal Foundations blog The Legal Pulse, Donald Earl Childress III analyzes the Courts January 14 opinion in Daimler AG v. Bauman, in which the Court held that the car company cannot be sued for injuries allegedly caused by the actions of an Argentinian subsidiary that took place entirely outside the country.
• At the Ogletree Deakins blog, Michael Ray breaks down, and comments on, Mondays opinion in the donning and doffing case Sandifer v. U.S. Steel Corporation.Bring out your links! Over the summer, we changed our system and now depend on our readers to submit links for possible inclusion in the daily round-up. If you have (or have read) a story or blog post about the Court, published in the last few days, that you would like us to consider, please send a link to[email protected]. Thank you!

[Disclosure: Kevin Russell of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, served as counsel to the respondents in Bauman, but I am no longer affiliated with the firm.]