Podcasts: Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project
on Feb 23, 2010 at 10:20 am
Continuing our series of five-minute podcasts on oral argument days, we have two new podcasts below with the counsel from both sides of today’s first case, Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project (08-1498; 09-89).  At issue in the case is whether a federal statute prohibiting the knowing provision of “any service, training, [or] expert advice or assistance†to a designated foreign terrorist organization is unconstitutionally vague.
For the petitioners, one of their amici:
Professor Peter Margulies of the Roger Williams University School of Law, representing “Scholars, Attorneys, and Former Public Officials with Experience in Terrorism-Related Issues”
For the respondents, their counsel:
Professor David Cole of Georgetown Law Center
Subscribe to the SCOTUSblog feed on iTunes to receive our latest podcasts regularly.